<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t mind stripping down on set? Consider body-doubling for the stars!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.instantcast.com/2008/10/09/stripping-down-on-set/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.instantcast.com/2008/10/09/stripping-down-on-set/</link>
	<description>Your Source for Casting Calls, Tips, and Gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:14:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Malarcher</title>
		<link>http://blog.instantcast.com/2008/10/09/stripping-down-on-set/comment-page-1/#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Malarcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://instantcast.wordpress.com/?p=3695#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information.  If put in that situation I would definitely opt for a body double.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information.  If put in that situation I would definitely opt for a body double.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Pratt</title>
		<link>http://blog.instantcast.com/2008/10/09/stripping-down-on-set/comment-page-1/#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://instantcast.wordpress.com/?p=3695#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>Thanks Renee for the info. I don&#039;t think it would bother me but I haven&#039;t been put into that position. I ma think differently if I were casted to a part to do so.
Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Renee for the info. I don&#8217;t think it would bother me but I haven&#8217;t been put into that position. I ma think differently if I were casted to a part to do so.<br />
Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.instantcast.com/2008/10/09/stripping-down-on-set/comment-page-1/#comment-4979</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://instantcast.wordpress.com/?p=3695#comment-4979</guid>
		<description>This was a very interesting article.  I was never aware of the fact that actors had an option to opt out when they didn&#039;t want to appear nude on the screen.  Now I know exactly what body-doubling means. LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very interesting article.  I was never aware of the fact that actors had an option to opt out when they didn&#8217;t want to appear nude on the screen.  Now I know exactly what body-doubling means. LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
